Yes No Share to Facebook
Azzeh v. Legendre, 2017 ONCA 385: The Lack of Knowledge of Notice Requirement
Question: Does not knowing about Ontario’s 10-day municipal injury notice rule count as a “reasonable excuse” for late notice?
Answer: In Ontario, Azzeh v. Legendre, 2017 ONCA 385 confirms that lack of awareness of the 10-day notice requirement under Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 generally isn’t a “reasonable excuse” on its own, though it may be assessed alongside other extenuating circumstances. Lippa Legal Services provides Ontario paralegal services to help you assess potential notice issues, gather supporting facts, and plan next steps for a claim involving a municipality.
Judicial Analysis: Azzeh v. Legendre
The Azzeh v. Legendre, 2017 ONCA 385, confirms that the "reasonable excuse" exception for failing to provide notice of an injury to a municipality within the ten-day notice requirement stipulated in section 44(10) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, Chapter 25, by itself, excludes failure to provide notice due to a lack of knowledge of the notice requirement. On this issue, it was specifically stated:
[43] In determining what constitutes a reasonable excuse, the words should be given their plain and ordinary meaning, and the court should consider all of the circumstances: see Crinson, at paras. 20-23; and Seif, at paras. 26, 47. Those circumstances would include, among other things, whether the plaintiff was capable of forming the intention to sue the municipality within the notice period under s. 44(10), or had a representative whose responsibility it was to retain a lawyer and pursue all claims; the length of the delay before notice was given; and any explanation of the reason for the delay. Lack of awareness of the notice requirement, standing alone, does not constitute a reasonable excuse, but when considered in combination with other extenuating circumstances, a court may conclude a reasonable excuse exists: see Crinson, at para. 38; and Seif, at para. 29 (per Hoy A.C.J.O., partly in dissent but not on this point).
This case underscores that ignorance of the law, meaning lack of awareness of the ten-day notice requirement, fails to qualify as a "reasonable excuse" for failing to provide the ten-day notice of an injury to a municipality. As what constitutes as a "reasonable excuse" requires careful review, a person seeking to bring a claim against a municipality, without having met the ten-day notice requirement, should carefully review the "reasonable excuse" exception prior to commencing the litigation.
NOTE: A significant quantity of online searches such as “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” typically indicates a desire for prompt and proficient legal support rather than a specific designation. In Ontario, “licensed paralegals” fall under the regulation of the same Law Society that governs lawyers and are authorised to represent clients in certain litigation situations. Core to this role are advocacy, legal analysis, and procedural expertise. Lippa Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed framework, focusing on strategic positioning, evidentiary preparation, and compelling advocacy aimed at securing efficient and advantageous outcomes for clients.